24
An ecameralize f the Register chews chart generally there
are no restoutidons against aben vessels
in coastal tombe
heline
engaging
but that a
tommy
required ni many plans to carry good expasangers from one Marmon boldens
auscher plan in the chine
ha
Colony, and a wine caull of cause refraid to anyone.
*
from the competition of any foreign vessels in the coastal trade of parts of the Empire.
Therefore
I would concur in the proposals in the draft note without furthat ado.
1.082.
6.11.42.
* This assumes that any rights granted to the Chinese in such a matter would have to be extended, under the most favoured nation principle, to all other foreign countries granting this country M.P.N. treatment.
I agree that the point is for the Economic Department, but Mr. L. V. Martin has, at my request, made some research into the matter. He has produced the attached circulars dated the 26th May, 1920 and the 29th July, 1926. The papers containing the replies to the 1926 circular have been destroyed under statute. Me Mantin is not entteavething to get the bound.
malar,
UNIS may take some Irotle
Library, Legal, have produced the attached extracts from Bahamas and Dominica legislation. The effect of these would appear to be that a Chinese boat could not ply for hire in Nassau Harbour but I doubt whether this affects the coastal trade. whether
The effect
of the moron-law would seem to be that a Chinese vessel could not carry coastwise trade unless the right to do so had been conferred by treaty. It might be well to bring these provisions to the notice of the Foreign Office and the Ministry of Shipping.", T Meanwhile, Me, Martin te endeavouring to get the ould replies to the 1920 circuter. I thinthe support thechWT. ver the 7th Advember attached
ZA
me
thas lete of
Juegaen
f1.42.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.